Ringer v. Basile’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
10 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently June 2017
10 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 26 U.S.C. § 6213 · 26 U.S.C. § 6335 · 26 U.S.C. § 7421 · 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 1444 · 28 U.S.C. § 2410
Relies on Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics · Butz v. Economou · United States v. Sherwood · Davis v. Passman · Enochs v. Williams Packing & Navigation Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“1) Defendant United States’ motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction is DENIED. 2) Defendants are DIRECTED to file answers on or before Friday, October 4, 1991. 3) Counsel shall explore cross motions for summary judgment with simultaneous briefing or in the alternative an agreed statement of facts and chronology of events. Counsel are to advise the court by October 25, 1991 what agreements and stipulations have been reached toward resolution of the factual and legal issues in this case. 4) The dispositive motions cutoff is SET for Monday, December 16, 1991.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. McEndree v. Wilson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.