Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 647 A2D 1198 - Musk v. Nelson

Musk v. Nelson’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

35
cited by 35 later decisions
3
states following
February 2026
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 1 district · 32 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently February 2026 · most notably Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Scarlett Harbor Associates Ltd. Partnership (1996), 126 Md. App. 179 - Klupt v. Krongard (1999)

1 federal appellate · 1 district · 32 state decisions

1201994200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Wescott v. Allstate Insurance · Myrick v. James · McAfee v. Cole · Anderson v. Neal · Choroszy v. Tso

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “any action for damages for injury or death against any health care provider, its agents or employees, or health care practitioner, his agents or employees, whether based upon tort or breach of contract or otherwise, arising out of the provision or failure to provide health care services.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “However, a well-settled rule of statutory interpretation states that express mention of one concept implies the exclusion of others not listed. The statute provides for a single exception and implicitly denies the availability of any other.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Limiting the availability of the discovery rule [to extend the statute of limitations] bears a rational relationship to the Legislature's goal to reduce malpractice insurance premiums and control the cost of health care.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.