Schoenhals v. Cockrum’s Empirical Analysis
647 F.2d 1080 · 1981
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 3 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently September 2019
8 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 201 (American Samoa Labor Standards Amendments of 1956) · 29 U.S.C. § 213 · 29 U.S.C. § 216
Relies on Phillips v. Walling US · Albemarle Paper Co. v. Moody · Legg v. Rock Products Manufacturing Corp. · Brennan v. Keyser · Homemakers Home & Health Care Services, Inc. v. Carden
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a]n employer who asserts he is exempt from the Act 'has the burden of establishing the exemption affirmatively and clearly.'”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[a]n employer who asserts he is exempt from the Act “has the burden of establishing the exemption affirmatively and clearly.” The Act constitutes humanitarian and remedial legislation. Exemptions must be narrowly construed and are limited to those establishments plainly and unmistakably within the terms and the spirt of the exemption invoked.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.