65 A.3d 913
Decided April 29, 2013
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · decided 2013-04-29
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently April 2014
1 state decisions
Key passage — most relied on by later courts
“Did a state trooper violate the Wiretap Act when he listened through the speaker on an informant’s cellular telephone as the informant arranged a drug deal with the defendant?”
quoted by 1 later decision, including Commonwealth v. Spence
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2013-04-29
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1ORDER
¶2AND NOW, this 29th day of April, 2013, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as phrased by Petitioner, is:
*914Did a state trooper violate the Wiretap Act when he listened through the speaker on an informant’s cellular telephone as the informant arranged a drug deal with the defendant?