¶1The decree appealed from in this case is affirmed, for the reasons set forth in the opinion of Vice-Chancellor Pitney, filed in the court of chancery, and reported in 19 Dick. Ch. Rep. 465.
¶2For reversal — None.
65 N.J. Eq. 764
Decided August 25, 1903
Supreme Court of New Jersey · decided 1903-08-25
Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently October 1944
1 district · 1 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1903-08-25
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1The decree appealed from in this case is affirmed, for the reasons set forth in the opinion of Vice-Chancellor Pitney, filed in the court of chancery, and reported in 19 Dick. Ch. Rep. 465.
¶2For reversal — None.