Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

65 N.J. Eq. 764

Schultz v. Van Doren

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided August 25, 1903

Supreme Court of New Jersey · decided 1903-08-25

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently October 1944

1 district · 1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1903-08-25

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam.

¶1The decree appealed from in this case is affirmed, for the reasons set forth in the opinion of Vice-Chancellor Pitney, filed in the court of chancery, and reported in 19 Dick. Ch. Rep. 465.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Van Syokel, Dixon, Garrison, Port, Hendrickson, Pitney, Swayze, Bogert, Vredenburgi-i, Voori-iees, Vroom, Green- — 13.

¶2For reversal — None.

/65/njeq/764 · .json · Public domain