65 N.J.L. 684
Decided March 4, 1901
Supreme Court of New Jersey · decided 1901-03-04
<p>On error to the Supreme Court.</p>
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently April 1956
1 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1901-03-04
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1The judgment of the Supreme Court is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion of Mr. Justice Yan Syckel in that court. Ante p. 65.
¶2For affirmance—-Ti-ie Chancellor, Dixon, Collins, Fort, G-arretson, Bogert, Krueger, Hendrickson, Adams, Yredenburgi-i, Yoorhees. 11.
¶3For reversal—Hone.