¶1ORDER
¶2The Court being equally divided, the order of the Superior Court is affirmed.
¶3FLAHERTY, ZAPPALA and CAPPY, JJ., dissent and would reverse the Order of the Superior Court and remand for a new trial.
652 A.2d 294
Decided December 30, 1994
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · decided 1994-12-30
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1994-12-30
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently December 2014
16 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1ORDER
¶2The Court being equally divided, the order of the Superior Court is affirmed.
¶3FLAHERTY, ZAPPALA and CAPPY, JJ., dissent and would reverse the Order of the Superior Court and remand for a new trial.