Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

652 F.2d 423

Docket No. 79-1397.

O'Hair v. Hill

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1981-07-22

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently July 1981

1 federal appellate ·

5 counsel of record

Relies on O'Hair v. Hill

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1981-07-22

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Madalyn Murray O'Hair, pro se.

Jon Murray, pro se.

Robert A. Vort, Newark, N.J., for plaintiffs-appellants.

James McMurtry, County Atty., B. Neal Stokey, Asst. County Atty., Ben C. Florey, Jr., Russell J. Bailey, Austin, Tex., for B. Jones, Renfro, Samuelson, Monts, Richards and Moya.

Susan O'Laughlin Bradshaw, Asst. Atty. Gen., Austin, Tex., for John Hill, et al.

(Opinion April 2, 1981, 5 Cir., 1980, 641 F.2d 307)

Before GODBOLD, Chief Judge, BROWN, AINSWORTH, CHARLES CLARK, RONEY, GEE, TJOFLAT, HILL, FAY, RUBIN, VANCE, KRAVITCH, FRANK M. JOHNSON, Jr., GARZA, HENDERSON, REAVLEY, POLITZ, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, RANDALL, TATE, SAM D. JOHNSON, THOMAS A. CLARK and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

¶1

A majority of the Judges in active service, on the Court's own motion, having determined to have this case reheard en banc,

¶2

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

/652/f2d/423 · .json · Public domain