Johnson v. Lucent Technologies Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
653 F.3d 1000 · 2011
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1658 · 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (Civil Rights Act of 1866) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 704 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 706 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)
Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Zipes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc. · Patterson v. McLean Credit Union · Delaware State College v. Ricks
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[Heave to amend should be granted unless the pleading could not possibly be cured by the allegation of other facts, and should be granted more liberally to pro se plaintiffs.” Id. (quoting McQuillion v. Schwarzenegger, 369 F.3d 1091, 1099 (9th Cir.2004) (internal quotation marks omitted)). . Judge Coughenour of this court recently certified three questions on this subject to the Washington Supreme Court. (See Bain v. Metropolitan Mortg., Cause No. C09-0149JCC (W.D.Wash.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Dep't , 901 F.2d 696 , 699 (9th Cir. 1990). All allegations of material fact are taken as true and construed in the light most favorable to the plaintiff. Johnson v. Lucent Techs., Inc. , 653 F.3d 1000 , 1010 (9th Cir. 2011). To survive a motion to dismiss,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.