Wright v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
August 1996
most recently cited
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 624 So. 2d 263 - Jones v. Jones · 640 So. 2d 1105 - Florida Bar v. Gentz · In the Interest of L.A.D. v. State · Arjomand v. Ross · 596 So. 2d 758 - Williams v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The law is clear that recovery and allowance of costs in criminal cases must be authorized by statute. Because the order does not point to any specific statutory authority allowing for recovery, the order is reversed and remanded for reference to the applicable statute or for deletion of the unsupported cost.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. McCray v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.