654 So. 2d 83 - Hale v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
September 2008
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 555 So. 2d 818 - Johnson v. State · Barton v. State · 21 Ala. App. 499 - Beecham v. State · 21 Ala. App. 498 - Thompson v. State · 564 So. 2d 95 - Stennet v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"`In reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence, this court must review the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution. The standard of review is whether legal evidence was presented to the jury from which the jury could by fair inference find the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.' Powell v. State, 576 So.2d 1285 , 1288 (Ala.Cr.App.1991) (citations omitted). Accord Johnson v. State, 555 So.2d 818, 819 (Ala.Cr.App.1989)."”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Wilson v. State · Smith v. State“to ignore `common sense, common reason, and common observation.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[p]hysical injury which creates a substantial risk of death, or which causes serious and protracted disfigurement, protracted impairment of health or protracted loss or impairment of the function of any bodily organ.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Marlowe v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.