Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 655 F.2d 195 - Valencia v. Limbs

Valencia v. Limbs’s Empirical Analysis

655 F.2d 195 · 1981

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
December 2009
most recently cited

10 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently December 2009

10 federal appellate · 2 district ·

90198119902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Smith v. Crouse · Fernandez v. Phillips · Collins v. Loisel

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is generally for the Magistrate to determine if the evidence establishes probable cause to believe that the fugitive committed the crime for which he stands accused. Review of the evidence before the Magistrate has been limited to a determination that there was competent evidence supporting the finding of extraditability.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “whether there was any evidence warranting the finding that there was reasonable ground to believe the accused guilty.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “there was competent legal evidence to support a finding of extraditability.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.