Lung v. Lung’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

1 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “2. The property owned by the parties between 1988 and 1991 should be divided pursuant to Indiana Code 31-1-11.5-11. The Court does not find that there are factors present which would warrant a deviation from the statutory presumption of an equal division of this property. 3. The periods of cohabitation prior to the marriage and the ongoing relationship of the parties prior to the marriage shall be considered by this Court as a factor in dividing property between the parties. 5. The parties’ marital residence located at 3850 N. Delaware Street, Indianapolis, Indiana had equity of $64,947.00 at the time of the parties’ physical separation in June of 1991.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Larkins v. Larkins

2. “A trial court’s decision regarding the division of marital property is reviewable for an abuse of discretion. We consider only that evidence most favorable to the trial court’s disposition of the property_ We will reverse a trial court only where the result reached is clearly against the logic and effect of the facts and circumstances before the court.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Larkins v. Larkins