Lamp v. Andrus’s Empirical Analysis
657 F.2d 1167 · 1981
Citation profile
11 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently January 2017
11 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Nixon · Catlin v. United States · Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Wetzel · Apodaca v. Texas · Century Laminating, Ltd. v. Montgomery
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“does not contemplate `implicit adjudication' of claims.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“adjudicates fewer than all the claims or the rights and liabilities of fewer than all the parties”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“for entry of a judgment adjudicating fewer than all the claims of the parties. Any other judgment,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Lamp v. Andrus
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.