State v. Unruh’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance v. United States · Granito v. United States · 436 So. 2d 93 - Combs v. State · 357 So. 2d 410 - McNamara v. State · 592 So. 2d 678 - Rahming v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In the case sub judice, the state never refused Unruh the opportunity to call and arrange for an independent test. They simply stated they would not provide transportation or make arrangements for the test. Here, the state did not interfere with Unruh's right to arrange for an independent blood test.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“IS THE STATE REQUIRED TO TAKE AFFIRMATIVE ACTION TO ASSIST A PERSON IN CUSTODY FOR DUI IN OBTAINING AN INDEPENDENT TEST FOR BLOOD ALCOHOL WHEN IT IS REQUESTED, PURSUANT TO SECTION 316.1932(1)(f)3, FLORIDA STATUTES?”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.