Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

66 So. 3d 1076

Young v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2011-08-09

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently February 2018

2 state decisions

Relies on Spera v. State · Lee v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2011-08-09

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1 The appellant is appealing an order in which the trial court struck the appellant’s postconviction claims as facially insufficient and, in accordance with Spera v. State, 971 So.2d 754, 761 (Fla.2007), granted the appellant thirty days to amend. The order is a nonappealable, nonfinal order. See Lee v. State, 939 So.2d 154, 155 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006).

¶2 DISMISSED.

BENTON, C.J., HAWKES and CLARK, JJ., concur.
/66/so3d/1076 · .json · Public domain