667 So. 2d 1014 - Brock v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
February 1998
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Beasley · 624 So. 2d 263 - Jones v. Jones · 618 So. 2d 734 - Biller v. State · 593 So. 2d 1049 - Aira v. State · In the Interest of L.A.D. v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“You will submit to urinalysis, breathalyzer or blood tests at any time requested by your Community Control officer, or the professional staff of any treatment center where you are receiving treatment, to determine possible use of alcohol, drugs or controlled substances. [1]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[T]he state overlooks the fact that the supreme court has held that it is `fundamental' error to order a criminal defendant to pay attorney fees without affording adequate notice and an opportunity to be heard.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[t]he mere use of alcohol is not related to any of the appellant's offenses and nothing in this record indicates it would relate to future criminality.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.