67 F. Supp. 2d 401 - D.M. v. Terhune’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
2 district · 3 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3006 · 28 U.S.C. § 636 · 42 U.S.C. § 12132 (§ 202 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 1988 · 42 U.S.C. § 1997 (Civil Rights of Institutionalized Persons Act) · 42 U.S.C. § 1997E
Relies on Hensley v. Eckerhart · Farrar v. Hobby · City of Detroit v. Grinnell Corporation, Manhattan-Ward, Incorporated v. Grinnell Corporation, 1225 Vine Street Building, Inc. v. Grinnell Corporation · Bill Martin Director Michigan Department of Correctionss v. Everett Hadix · General Motors Corporation Pick-Up Truck Fuel Tank Products Liability Litigation 94-1064 94-1194 94-1195 94-1198 94-1202 94-1203 94-1207 94-1208 94-1219
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the present value of the damages the plaintiff would likely recover, if successful, discounted by the risk of not prevailing.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“settlement is a compromise, a yielding of the highest hopes in exchange for certainty and resolution.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.