Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

67 N.J. Eq. 729

Buttlar v. Buttlar

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided December 9, 1904

Supreme Court of New Jersey · decided 1904-12-09

<p>On appeal from a decree advised by Vice-Chancellor Pitney, whose opinion is reported ante p. 136.</p>

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1904-12-09

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently December 1986

3 state decisions

10190419101920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Pee Cubiam.

¶1The decree appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons given in the opinion of Vice-Chancellor Pitney in the court below.

¶2For affirmance — Dixon, Gaebison, Poet, Pitney, Bogeet, Veedenbuegh, Vboom, Geeen, Geay — 9.

¶3For reversal — None.

/67/njeq/729 · .json · Public domain