¶1Two eases with the above title were argued together.
¶2The judgment in each of them is affirmed, for the reasons given in the per curiam opinion of the Supreme Court. 37 Vroom 443.
¶3For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Van Syckel, Garretson, Fort, Garretson, Pitney, Krueger, Adams, Vredenburgh, Voorhees, Vroom. 12.
¶4For reversal — None.