67 N.J.L. 688
Decided June 16, 1902
Supreme Court of New Jersey · decided 1902-06-16
<p>On error to the Supreme Court.</p>
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1902-06-16
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently January 1983
6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1The judgment below - is affirmed, for the reasons given in the opinion of Mr. Justice Lippineott, reported in 34 Vroom 435.
¶2For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Dixon, Garrison, Collins, Fort, Garretson, Hendrickson, Pitney, Krueger, Vredenburgh, Voorhees. 12.
¶3For reversal — Vroom. 1.