State v. Ulibarri’s Empirical Analysis
1960
Citation profile
44 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently March 2015 · most notably State v. Manus (1979), Sells v. State (1982)
44 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Kidd · State v. Smith · Torres v. State · Territory of New Mexico v. Lynch · State v. Hall
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"... where there is any evidence tending to show such a state of facts as may bring the homicide within the grade of manslaughter, defendant is entitled to an instruction on the law of manslaughter, and it is fatal error to refuse it...."”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Ramirez · State v. Lunn““‘DELIBERATE’ or ‘DELIBERATION’ is a thinking over with a calm and reflective mind to do an act. Implied malice, as defined above [the statutory definition] is not sufficient to constitute murder in the first degree. In order to find the Defendant guilty of first degree murder, you must find express malice as defined herein [the statutory definition].””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Rushing““This court has often held that the trial court must instruct the jury in every degree of the crime charged when there is evidence in the case tending to sustain such degree. * * * ””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Andrada
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.