Kenney v. Head’s Empirical Analysis
670 F.3d 354 · 2012
Citation profile
3 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Whren v. United States · United States v. Abel · Sprint/United Management Co. v. Mendelsohn · United States v. Soto-Beníquez · Astro-Med, Inc. v. Nihon Kohden America, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“). Instead of considering any subjective motive of an individual officer,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“evidence having any tendency to make the existence of any fact that is of consequence to the determination of the action more probable or less probable than it would be without the evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[e]vidence which is not relevant is not admissible.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.