Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

671 A.2d 222

In re Davis

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 31, 1996

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · decided 1996-01-31

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently June 2017

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1996-01-31

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM:

¶2AND NOW, this 31st day of January, 1996, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania dated December 11, 1995, the Petition for Reinstatement is granted.

¶3Pursuant to Rule 218(e), Pa.R.D.E., petitioner is directed to pay the expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement.

¶4ZAPPALA, J., did not participate in this matter.

/671/a2d/222 · .json · Public domain