Commonwealth v. Reiss

Decided March 18, 1996

Decided 1996-03-18

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2The court being evenly divided, the order of the Superior Court is affirmed.

NIX, C. J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

¶3 *785FLAHERTY, ZAPPALA and NIGRO, JJ., would reverse the order of the Superior Court.