Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 672 SO2D 826 - Patterson v. Rivkind

Patterson v. Rivkind’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
April 1996
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 624 So. 2d 263 - Jones v. Jones · 659 So. 2d 269 - Forest Park Condominium Ass'n v. Widera · 652 So. 2d 815 - Salgat v. State · 662 So. 2d 930 - In re Code of Judicial Conduct · Frederick, as Co. Solicitor v. Rowe as Judge

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “IS THE EXCLUSIVE AND PERPETUAL MONTHLY ASSIGNMENT, CONTINUING OVER SEVERAL YEARS, OF COUNTY COURT JUDGES TO HEAR ALL PETITIONS FOR PERMANENT AND TEMPORARY INJUNCTIONS IN THE DOMESTIC VIOLENCE DEPARTMENT OF THE FAMILY DIVISION OF THE ELEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COURT UNLAWFUL?”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.