Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

673 A.2d 921

James v. James

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 11, 1996

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · decided 1996-04-11

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1996-04-11

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently March 2011

4 state decisions

20199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2AND NOW, this 11th day of April, 1996, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is granted. The case shall be submitted on briefs. Argument is restricted to the following question:

1. Where a spouse has a pension which is partially marital property and partially *922separate property, and where the pension right is vested under a contract which involves the purchase, during the marriage, of time-of-service in exchange for an ongoing reduction of pension payments, should the purchased time-of-service be treated as—
a. purchased with marital property;
b. purchased with separate property except for the amount of payment reductions incurred during the marriage; or
c. irrelevant with respect to determining the fraction of the pension which is marital property and the fraction which is treated as separate property?
/673/a2d/921 · .json · Public domain