Cantrell v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently August 2017
3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Easton v. State · Rogers v. State · Grimes v. State · 153 Ind. App. 421 - Bradley v. State · Coleman v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“, this court deems as a matter of law that there is not sufficient evidence to convict the defendant. 'There is other evidence which adds to the above”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Brink v. State“evidence is not so clear and convincing to support a jury determination that [the defendant] is guilty beyond a. reasonable doubt.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Brink v. State“evidence lends itself to a conclusion that the defendant was in the house and committed the crime,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Brink v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.