State v. Strand’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently August 2024
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 28 Cal. 3d 739 - People v. Chadd · United States v. Silverman · United States v. Grady · 1 Cal. 2d 611 - People v. McGee · 37 Ill. 2d 205 - The PEOPLE v. Isaacs
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he defendants are put on timely notice, because of the pendency of an indictment, filed within the statutory time frame, that they will be called to account for their activities and should prepare a defense.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Dwire
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.