Hill v. Hill’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
July 2014
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 492 So. 2d 1329 - Florida Bar v. Wolf · 335 So. 2d 5 - Shannon v. State · 593 So. 2d 491 - Robertson v. Robertson · Kollar v. Kollar · 652 So. 2d 404 - Rutland v. Rutland
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In our case, the husband deeded all of his "right, title, interest, claim and demand" in the property to himself and his wife as tenants by the entireties. . . . He made the wife aware of the conveyance, apparently without advising her of his now claimed reservation of an equitable interest. He held her out to others as a co-owner of the property when he permitted her to join with him in the joint execution of a note and mortgage for the financing of subsequent improvements. And he testified, as did the husband in Kollar , that he wanted the wife to have the home if he predeceased her.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Simmons v. Simmons
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.