Parker v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
25 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently August 2018 · most notably Koval v. SIMON TELELECT. INC. (1998), Sanders v. State (2005)
25 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Morrissey v. Brewer · Gagnon v. Scarpelli · United States v. Berry · United States v. Diaz-Burgos · Lystarczyk v. Smits
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(a) written notice of the claimed violations of [probation]; (b) disclosure to the [probationer] of evidence against him; (c) opportunity to be heard in person and to present witnesses and documentary evidence; (d) the right to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses (unless the hearing officer specifically finds good cause for not allowing confrontation); (e) a ‘neutral and detached’ hearing body ...; and (f) a written statement by the factfinders as to the evidence relied on and reasons for revoking [probation].”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“[a] clear and unequivocal admission of fact by an attorney is a judicial admission which is binding on the client.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[w]hen the State seeks to revoke a defendant's placement in a Community Corrections Program, the defendant is 'not entitled to the full due process rights afforded a defendant in a criminal proceeding.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.