Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 676 So. 2d 1013 - Formor v. State

676 So. 2d 1013 - Formor v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
September 2006
most recently cited

12 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 559 So. 2d 187 - State v. Law · 293 So. 2d 44 - Lynch v. State · 426 So. 2d 963 - Faison v. State · Berry v. State · 533 So. 2d 763 - Ferguson v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he limited movement and confinement of the victims within the bathrooms was minimal, insignificant and merely incidental to the crime of robbery.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “slight, inconsequential, and merely incidental”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Two black men wearing ski masks, and carrying either one or two sawed-off shotguns, entered a total of three unlocked guest rooms at the Ramada Inn and the Quality Inn. They ordered the victims at gunpoint to get on the floor or be killed. After robbing the victims, the men ordered them into the bathroom of each motel room, and told them not to come out or they might be killed. The victims stayed in the bathrooms while the robbers went through their luggage and valuables.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.