Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 679 F.2d 192 - Phillips v. United States

Phillips v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

679 F.2d 192 · 1982

Citation profile

72
cited by 72 later decisions
6
states following
October 2016
most recently cited

58 federal appellate · 3 district · 9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 72 later decisions — most recently October 2016 · most notably United States v. Black (1985), United States v. Harris (1985)

58 federal appellate · 3 district · 9 state decisions

5401982199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (White-Collar Crime Penalty Enhancement Act of 2002) · 18 U.S.C. § 1342 · 18 U.S.C. § 3651 · 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Boesche v. Udall · Abujasen v. United States · Karrell v. United States · United States v. Taylor

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 72 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““We feel that when a defendant consents pursuant to a plea agreement to pay such a restitutionary amount and such plea bargain is fully explored in open court and the defendant thereafter signs a stipulation to the effect that restitution in such a sum is to be paid, then the court is bound by law to carry out that specific agreement.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “in mail fraud cases, 'offense' includes the fraudulent scheme alleged as an element of the offense and restitution may be ordered in an amount caused by the entire scheme rather than only in the amount caused by a particular mailing.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “properly require, as a condition of probation, payment of those taxes reported by the defendant as due for 1958, 1959 and 1960 since such liability is admitted”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.