State v. Senquiz’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
38 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently March 2020 · most notably State v. Ceballos (2003), 71 Conn. App. 217 - State v. Colon (2002)
38 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Golding · Fertel-Rust v. Dane County Social Services · Hiatt v. Indiana State Student Assistance Commission · Emigrant Savings Bank v. Cam · State v. Troupe
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[The jury] is free to juxtapose conflicting versions of events and determine which is more credible. ... It is the [jury's] exclusive province to weigh the conflicting evidence and to determine the credibility of witnesses. ... The [jury] can ... decide what-all, none, or some-of a witness' testimony to accept or reject.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[w]hile the victim may have sometimes put forth confused, apparently forgetful, or even contradictory testimony, it was solely up to the jury to determine the weight of each part of the victim's testimony”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Fernando V.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.