Roberts v. Genting’s Empirical Analysis
2023
Citation profile
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from New York Eastern District Court)
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 2101 (§ 2 of the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 2102 (§ 3 of the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 2104 (§ 5 of the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 2107 (§ 8 of the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act)
Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Christensen v. Harris County · Jeffreys v. The City of New York · Morales v. Quintel Entertainment, Inc. · Capobianco v. City of New York
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.