Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 68 N.M. 298 - Alford v. Drum

Alford v. Drum’s Empirical Analysis

1961

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
2
states following
February 2006
most recently cited

26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently February 2006 · most notably Dahl v. Turner (1969), Matter of Ferrill (1981)

26 state decisions

14019611970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Frei v. Brownlee · Jackson v. King · State v. Bosch · Landers v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. · Carpenter v. Yates

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[Notwithstanding the failure of a party to demand a jury in an action in which such a demand might have been made of right, the court in its discretion upon motion may order a trial by a jury of any or all issues. [Emphasis added.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““The granting of the motion for a trial by jury was a matter within the discretion of the trial court, even though a jury had been waived pursuant to § 21-1-1(38) (d), 1953 Comp., being Rule 38 (d), our Rules of Civil Procedure.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.