United States v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis
683 F.2d 1236 · 1982
Citation profile
12 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently August 2022
12 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1013 (§ 3 of the McCarran-Ferguson Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 1153 · 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 18 U.S.C. § 3401 · 18 U.S.C. § 3651 · 18 U.S.C. § 5005 · 18 U.S.C. § 5010 · 18 U.S.C. § 5031
Relies on Southeastern Community College v. Davis · Chapman v. Houston Welfare Rights Organization · Dorszynski v. United States · Hassett v. Welch · Turner v. Louisiana
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If the court is of the opinion that the youth offender does not need commitment, it may suspend the imposition or execution of sentence and place the youth offender on probation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.