O'Shea v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently September 2015
10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3651
Relies on United States v. Workman · United States v. Rodriguez · 17 Wash. App. 363 - Gillespie v. State · Gonzales v. State · Jackson v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a probationer can not obtain credit against [his probation] period for any. period of time during which he was not, in fact, under probationary supervision by virtue of his own wrongful act.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Mantor v. State“consistently held that a period of probation ... is tolled when a probationer is imprisoned for another crime.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Mantor v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.