Johnson v. Napolitano’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
2 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 704 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Crawford v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson Cty. · Fogleman v. Mercy Hospital, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“testified, assisted, or participated in any manner in an investigation, proceeding, or hearing under [the statute],”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the reasons behind the employer's discriminatory animus are actually correct as a factual matter.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“focuses on the employer's subjective reasons for taking adverse action against an employee”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.