Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

686 So. 2d 1297

Butts v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · decided 1996-06-21

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently January 1997

2 state decisions

Relies on Armstrong v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1996-06-21

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PATTERSON, Judge.

¶1Robert L. Butts appeals from his probation revocation. At the hearing, he *1298admitted that he failed to report to his probation officer and pay supervision fees. Thus, we reject his claim that his probation was revoked without evidence. Yet, there is no written order. We remand this case for production of a written statement of evidence relied upon by the trial court and its reasons for the revocation. Armstrong v. State, 294 Ala. 100, 312 So.2d 620 (1975).

¶2REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

All Judges concur except COBB, J., who is not sitting.
/686/so2d/1297 · .json · Public domain