Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

686 So. 2d 758

Docket No. 96-1104.

Walker v. State

George WALKER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 16, 1997.

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1997-01-16

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently July 2012

13 state decisions

Key passage — most relied on by later courts

“to enter a written order, consistent with its oral pronouncement, revoking appellant's probation”

quoted by 2 later decisions, including Martin v. State, Koch v. State

Relies on Anders v. California

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1997-01-16

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender; P. Douglas Brinkmeyer, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee; appellant pro se, for Appellant.

¶2Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General; James W. Rogers, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

¶3PER CURIAM.

¶4In this direct criminal appeal, the public defender has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Appellant has also filed a brief in proper person. Having reviewed the entire record, and considered the issue raised by appellant, we agree that no reversible error occurred. Accordingly, we affirm the revocation of appellant's probation, and the sentence imposed. However, we note that it does not appear that a written order was entered revoking appellant's probation. On remand, the trial court is directed to *759 enter a written order, consistent with its oral pronouncement, revoking appellant's probation. Appellant need not be present.

¶5AFFIRMED and REMANDED, with directions.

¶6MINER, WEBSTER and LAWRENCE, JJ., concur.

/686/so2d/758 · .json · Public domain