Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

888 So. 2d 736

Docket No. 1D03-3299.

Koch v. State

Bryan A. KOCH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 10, 2004.

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2004-12-10

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently February 2018

11 state decisions

Key passage — most relied on by later courts

“to enter a written order, consistent with its oral pronouncement, revoking appellant's probation”

quoted by 1 later decision, including Martin v. State

Relies on 510 So. 2d 1202 - Clark v. State · Walker v. State · Oliver v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2004-12-10

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender; Joel Arnold, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

¶2Charlie Crist, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

¶3PER CURIAM.

¶4We affirm, but remand in order that a written order memorializing the revocation can be entered. See Oliver v. State,819 So.2d 816, 816 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002) (affirming appellant's revocation of probation and imposition of judgment and sentence, but because no order revoking appellant's probation had been entered, remanding for entry of written order consistent with the trial court's oral pronouncement); Walker v. State,686 So.2d 758, 758-59 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997) (affirming and remanding for the trial court "to enter a written order, consistent with its oral pronouncement, revoking appellant's probation"); Clark v. State,510 So.2d 1202, 1204 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987) ("While we find no reversible error in the trial court's oral findings, we remand for the entry of a written order conforming to the oral pronouncements.").

¶5Affirmed; remanded with instructions.

¶6ALLEN, DAVIS, and BENTON, JJ., concur.

/888/so2d/736 · .json · Public domain