Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 687 SW2D 505 - Rodriguez v. State

Rodriguez v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
December 1994
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Wilson v. State · Williams v. State · Kirkpatrick v. State · Stearn v. State · Ford v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Where defendant or his witnesses has been impeached or sought to be impeached by proof of contradictory statements, it is error to refuse to permit defendant to sustain his own testimony or that of his witness by proof of statements similar to those testified to on the trial which were made shortly after the transaction and before any motive or inducement existed to fabricate.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Texas law has for years required a charge instructing the jury that, before they can consider evidence of extraneous bad acts, they must find beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant committed those acts.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.