Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

688 A.2d 165

Commonwealth v. Skibicki

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 20, 1996

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · decided 1996-12-20

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently June 1997

3 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1996-12-20

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2AND NOW, this 20th day of December, 1996, the Commonwealth’s Petition for Reconsideration is granted. This Court’s order of August 21, 1996 is vacated. The Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED BUT LIMITED to the question of whether the Superior Court erred by denying Petitioner’s PCRA Petition alleging that counsel was ineffective by failing to object to the submission of written instructions to the jury.

¶3It is further ordered that the case be submitted on briefs and consolidated with Commonwealth v. Todaro, — Pa. -, 688 A.2d 165 (1996).

/688/a2d/165 · .json · Public domain