Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

69 F.3d 532

Docket No. 95-7215.

Burris v. Judd

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: October 12, 1995. Decided: October 26, 1995.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1995-10-26

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1915 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Comband Technologies Incorporated Crestar Bank v. Comband Technologies Incorporated

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1995-10-26

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Darrell Andre Burris, Appellant Pro Se.

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) claim as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1915(d) (1988). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Burris v. Judd, No. CA-95-528-5 (E.D.N.C. July 26, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

/69/f3d/532 · .json · Public domain