Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

69 F.3d 533

Docket No. 95-6983.

Julian Edward Rochester v. Sallie C. Smith, Clerk South Carolina, Sc G. Robert Deloach, Iii, Staff Attorney William H. Ballenger, Judge, Tenth Circuit

Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1995-10-25

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on McCormick v. J Angelone Jl

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1995-10-25

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Julian Edward Rochester, Appellant Pro Se.

William Henry Davidson, II, John Thomas Lay, Jr., ELLIS, LAWHORNE, DAVIDSON, SIMS, MORRISON & SOJOURNER, P.A., Columbia, South Carolina; Merl Floyd Code, Sr., CODE, WESTON & MOSLEY, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Rochester v. Smith, No. CA-94-629-2-21AJ (D.S.C. June 9, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

/69/f3d/533 · .json · Public domain