Willard v. Sullivan. Assumpsit, to recover upon a special promise by the owner to pay the past and future bills of a sub-contractor. Facts found by the court. One Beaudry, the principal contractor, was asked -what the final result of his contract with the owner was,— whether the house cost more or less than the contract price. The plaintiff objected on the ground that it was immaterial.
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1898-12-05
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently March 1937
6 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
