Patz v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
2
states following
March 2006
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 626 So. 2d 1048 - Peters v. State · 393 So. 2d 567 - State Ex Rel. Garlovsky v. Eastmoore · 636 So. 2d 895 - Cook v. State · Kahn v. State · Murphy v. Hoenigmann
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he case law in this area is very clear that strict adherence to the rule is absolutely imperative. `Scrupulous compliance with Rule 3.830 is required because its provisions constitute the essence of due process.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.