United States v. Faherty’s Empirical Analysis
692 F.2d 1258 · 1982
Citation profile
11 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3651 · 21 U.S.C. § 844 (§ 404 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 952 · 21 U.S.C. § 960
Relies on Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · Dothard v. Rawlinson · Henderson v. United States · United States v. Lemon · United States v. Guadalupe-Garza
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'The question whether a consent to a search was in fact voluntary or was the product of duress or coercion, express or implied, is a question of fact to be determined from the totality of all the circumstances.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.