692 So. 2d 266 - Warner v. Warner’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
36 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently February 2019 · most notably 724 So. 2d 679 - Shrove v. Shrove (1999), 720 So. 2d 266 - Rodriguez v. Campbell (1998)
36 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 472 So. 2d 1145 - Florida Patient's Compensation Fund v. Rowe · 520 So. 2d 582 - King v. State · 584 So. 2d 993 - Pirez v. Brescher · 634 So. 2d 782 - Woodard v. Woodard · 638 So. 2d 160 - Abernethy v. Fishkin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If the court is going to impute income not apparent from the record, it must indicate the amount and source.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“This affidavit was not served upon appellant prior to entry of the ... orders, nor was he afforded any opportunity to review or examine the amounts.... [T]he court must ... give notice to the party against whom award will be made, and afford an opportunity to review and rebut the reasonableness of any amount claimed. An opportunity to adduce testimony and rebut must be afforded before entry.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“In the event of such voluntary unemployment or underemployment, the employment potential and probable earnings level of the parent shall be determined based upon his or her recent work history, occupational qualifications, and prevailing earnings level in the community.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.